Tuesday 27 July 2021

Winkle Picking

The Expert Game is Terence Reese's classic book on card play, first published in 1958 and widely considered to be one of the best bridge books of all time. In the last chapter Reese describes three types of 'secondary' squeeze - so called because a trick must be lost in the end-game - and gives them descriptive names; the vice, the winkle and the stepping stone.

You might think that these obscure squeezes are only of academic interest, but one came up on this hand from last Friday's Allendale pairs. West led the two of clubs against Ann's 3NT. There only appear to be eleven tricks, but watch what happens...Can you believe that declarer might make two diamond tricks in the end game?


Declarer wins the first trick with the ace (an essential move to avoid blocking the suit) and runs eight winners in the major suits. West is forced to release a diamond, leaving this position. 

 

Now declarer plays a club to the ten and exits with a diamond, leaving the opponents to choose their poison. The defence can win the diamond in either hand, but must then concede the last two tricks.

It's a shame to spoil a good story, but honesty compels me to record that it wasn't quite like that in real life. Ann slipped at the final hurdle by cashing the king of clubs at trick eleven, although East returned the favour by playing the ace on the diamond lead from dummy.

When I dug out The Expert Game from an obscure corner of my bookshelf, I discovered that the play on this hand is a winkle, 'a rare squeeze in which a trick is offered to the defenders but whichever wins the trick is then endplayed'. Declarer winkles an extra trick from the diamond suit where both opponents hold top cards.

The Official Encylopedia of Bridge gives this remarkable hand as an example of a winkle. It also features a suit of Jxx facing 10xx where declarer makes two tricks. But the similarity ends there; this hand occurred in the US International Team Trials rather than a local duplicate, the players were Hall-of-Famers rather than honest hackers, and the winkle brought in a slam rather than an extra overtrick in a mundane 3NT.
 


 

The silly final contract was due to a bidding misunderstanding. North thought that 4♠ was a two-ace reply to Gerber (!) while South thought that 4♠ was natural and implied a singleton heart. 

West led a diamond; declarer finessed, threw a heart on the ace of diamonds and ruffed a diamond. He then crossed to the ace of clubs, ruffed another diamond to remove the king and cashed two trumps ending in dummy. The established queen of diamonds forced East to throw a heart and declarer now played the the queen of spades and a spade to the ten and king. He then exited with a heart - the defence could win in either hand but then had to concede the last two tricks.