This was a fine defence played against us at the Christchurch Friday pairs. I will give it as a problem.
You are East, and your double of the transfer bid showed a strong hand that would have doubled 1NT. Your partner leads the ten of hearts, playing standard leads. Plan the defence.
Our round against Krzys and Patrick started well when the famed Polish Club misfired, allowing us to play in 2 diamonds up one when they were cold for 4 clubs and the club suit never got a mention. They got their revenge on this board, where this was the full layout. Your double has marked you with most of the high cards, so click 'Next' to see your fate if you play the ace of hearts on the first trick.
Playing a low heart at trick one will lead to the same end play. At the table, Krzys found the fine defence of the jack at trick one. Now there was no chance of an end play as West can win the second round of hearts to play a diamond through. Declarer was reduced to trying the trump finesse and the contract failed.
Monday, 27 February 2012
Tuesday, 7 February 2012
Foiled Again
I have never managed to bring off a trump squeeze, but at the Christchurch Friday duplicate a couple of defensive errors set up the required position. And for once I recognised the possibility at the table and not just in the post-mortem. And the opponents' cards were such that a trump squeeze was needed to gain an extra overtrick. But as you might expect from the title, things did not quite go according to plan...
My partner's raise to 4 spades was well-judged. West's failure to support partner was not, as it allowed us to conduct an invitational auction rather than guess whether to bid game.
West led a heart which, for reasons that have since escaped me, I won in dummy. West took the first trump and returned a club, which was ducked to my queen. (That was where both defenders went wrong.) I then played four more rounds of trumps and the ace of hearts. East does best to discard his hearts and a club, which would lead to this position.
Now when I play the penultimate trump and throw a diamond from dummy, East is caught in a trump squeeze. If he throws a club I cross to a diamond and ruff a club to set up dummy's king; if he throws a diamond I cash two top diamonds and ruff a club back to hand and score the last diamond.
So did I manage all this? Unfortunately not. No doubt expecting me to have some hearts after his partner's failure to support, East chose to keep hearts and his first four discards were two clubs, a heart and a diamond. Now I had plenty of tricks, but no trump squeeze. I played a diamond to the king, ruffed out the ace of clubs, and then another diamond to the ace, remembering to unblock the nine from hand. The king of clubs was a winner but I ruffed it and salvaged something from the wreckage by winning the last trick with the seven of diamonds.
My partner's raise to 4 spades was well-judged. West's failure to support partner was not, as it allowed us to conduct an invitational auction rather than guess whether to bid game.
West led a heart which, for reasons that have since escaped me, I won in dummy. West took the first trump and returned a club, which was ducked to my queen. (That was where both defenders went wrong.) I then played four more rounds of trumps and the ace of hearts. East does best to discard his hearts and a club, which would lead to this position.
Now when I play the penultimate trump and throw a diamond from dummy, East is caught in a trump squeeze. If he throws a club I cross to a diamond and ruff a club to set up dummy's king; if he throws a diamond I cash two top diamonds and ruff a club back to hand and score the last diamond.
So did I manage all this? Unfortunately not. No doubt expecting me to have some hearts after his partner's failure to support, East chose to keep hearts and his first four discards were two clubs, a heart and a diamond. Now I had plenty of tricks, but no trump squeeze. I played a diamond to the king, ruffed out the ace of clubs, and then another diamond to the ace, remembering to unblock the nine from hand. The king of clubs was a winner but I ruffed it and salvaged something from the wreckage by winning the last trick with the seven of diamonds.
Sunday, 1 January 2012
Year End 2011
The Swiss Teams at the Year End in London was a bit of a struggle - we lost four of the first five matches but then won the last two to finish near halfway. I misplayed this hand, which is a good example of the adage ' when you have found a good play, look for a better one'.
West led the queen of spades to my ace and it looked like a text book hand where you need to knock out the opponents' entries in the right order. West was more likely to have long spades, so I played on hearts first to knock out his possible entry. East won the second round and continued spades - I ducked and won the third round, discarding a club from dummy. I now cashed the king of clubs, preparing to finesse the jack on the next round and lose the lead to East, the safe hand if West started with five spades.
It was bad news when West showed out but I still had Plan B. I crossed to the ace of clubs and cashed the winning hearts; if East held the king of diamonds he would have to come down to two clubs and two diamonds as his last four cards, and I could endplay him by playing ace and another diamond. All to no avail as West won the king of diamonds and I was one down.
Where I went wrong was to play the king of clubs. I should have led a low club and played the jack, which would have ensured three club tricks against any distribution while keeping West off lead.
With the new Bridgemates the results from all tables are now available on the internet for sad people to analyse. On this hand 3NT was played 70 times on a spade lead and was only made 21 times. Both declarers went off in the match between the teams that finished first and second. And Zia's team lost 800 in 7 clubs doubled! That makes me feel a bit better.
West led the queen of spades to my ace and it looked like a text book hand where you need to knock out the opponents' entries in the right order. West was more likely to have long spades, so I played on hearts first to knock out his possible entry. East won the second round and continued spades - I ducked and won the third round, discarding a club from dummy. I now cashed the king of clubs, preparing to finesse the jack on the next round and lose the lead to East, the safe hand if West started with five spades.
It was bad news when West showed out but I still had Plan B. I crossed to the ace of clubs and cashed the winning hearts; if East held the king of diamonds he would have to come down to two clubs and two diamonds as his last four cards, and I could endplay him by playing ace and another diamond. All to no avail as West won the king of diamonds and I was one down.
Where I went wrong was to play the king of clubs. I should have led a low club and played the jack, which would have ensured three club tricks against any distribution while keeping West off lead.
With the new Bridgemates the results from all tables are now available on the internet for sad people to analyse. On this hand 3NT was played 70 times on a spade lead and was only made 21 times. Both declarers went off in the match between the teams that finished first and second. And Zia's team lost 800 in 7 clubs doubled! That makes me feel a bit better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)